http://www.vabike.org/vbf-2010-legislative-agenda/ Advocacy, Safety, & Education Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:52:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://www.vabike.org/vbf-2010-legislative-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-6229 Contrarian Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:43:23 +0000 http://www.vabike.org/?p=2452#comment-6229 Virginia already considers cyclists in crossswalks to be pedestrians: "46.2-904. A person riding a bicycle, electric personal assistive mobility device, or an electric power assisted bicycle on a sidewalk, shared-use path, or across a roadway on a crosswalk, shall have all the rights and duties of a pedestrian under the same circumstances." Virginia already considers cyclists in crossswalks to be pedestrians:
“46.2-904. A person riding a bicycle, electric personal assistive
mobility device, or an electric power assisted bicycle on a sidewalk, shared-use path, or across a roadway on a crosswalk, shall have all the rights and duties of a pedestrian under the same circumstances.”

]]> http://www.vabike.org/vbf-2010-legislative-agenda/comment-page-1/#comment-6227 Michael Roy Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:59:04 +0000 http://www.vabike.org/?p=2452#comment-6227 HB 459 begs the question of whether a cyclist is a pedestrian. Loudon County sheriff's department, for one, takes the position that a cyclist in a crosswalk is not a pedestrian unless he dismounts and walks his bike. HB 459 begs the question of whether a cyclist is a pedestrian. Loudon County sheriff’s department, for one, takes the position that a cyclist in a crosswalk is not a pedestrian unless he dismounts and walks his bike.

]]>